Hi Mohammad,
On 1/12/24 18:57, Nassiri, Mohammad wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2023 9:36 PM
>
>> +
>> +static void end_server(const char *tst_name, int sk,
>> + struct tcp_ao_counters *begin) {
>> + struct tcp_ao_counters end;
>> +
>> + if (test_get_tcp_ao_counters(sk, &end))
>> + test_error("test_get_tcp_ao_counters()");
>> + verify_keys(tst_name, sk, false, true);
>> +
>> + synchronize_threads(); /* 4: verified => closed */
>> + close(sk);
>> +
>> + verify_counters(tst_name, true, false, begin, &end);
>
> Shouldn't it be reversed instead?
> verify_counters(tst_name, false, true, begin, &end);
> The sk is an accept socket and the function is called by the server.
Good catch!
Do you want to send a patch? :-)
>> + synchronize_threads(); /* 5: counters */ }
>> +
>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> +{
>> + test_init(120, server_fn, client_fn);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
Thanks,
Dmitry
