Re: [PATCH] selftests/filesystems:fix build error in overlayfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello!

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 03:40:59PM +0800, Hu Yadi wrote:
> One build issue comes up due to both mount.h included dev_in_maps.c
> 
> In file included from dev_in_maps.c:10:
> /usr/include/sys/mount.h:35:3: error: expected identifier before numeric constant
>    35 |   MS_RDONLY = 1,  /* Mount read-only.  */
>       |   ^~~~~~~~~
> In file included from dev_in_maps.c:13:
> 
> Remove one of them to solve conflict, another error comes up:
> 
> dev_in_maps.c:170:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mount’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   170 |  if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_SLAVE | MS_REC, NULL) == -1) {
>       |      ^~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> 
> and then , add sys_mount definition to solve it
> After both above, dev_in_maps.c can be built correctly on my mache(gcc 10.2,glibc-2.32,kernel-5.10)

This is apparently the same error as in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/11cdac1e-e96c-405f-63e8-35b0e2926337@xxxxxxx/

I'm getting the impression that we are fixing the issue at the wrong layer here?
After all, the mount() syscall is supposed to be used with <sys/mount.h>
according to the mount(2) man page?  It feels a bit like cheating to resort to
sys_mount() instead...?

Do you have any deeper thoughts on what could be the underlying issue here?
With my newer GCC toolchains, I have been unable to reproduce this.

Thanks,
—Günther






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux