[broonie-ci:kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap] [kselftest/seccomp] bb94019905: kernel-selftests.seccomp.seccomp_benchmark.fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests.seccomp.seccomp_benchmark.fail" on:

commit: bb94019905757de0ddac22e897b7648b55aeef8e ("kselftest/seccomp: Report each expectation we assert as a KTAP test")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/broonie/ci.git kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap

in testcase: kernel-selftests
version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-60acb023-1_20230329
with following parameters:

	group: group-s



compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 36 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz (Cascade Lake) with 32G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)




If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202312271441.2e64d159-oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx



# timeout set to 120
# selftests: seccomp: seccomp_benchmark
# TAP version 13
# 1..7
# # Running on:
# # Linux lkp-csl-d01 6.7.0-rc3-00003-gbb9401990575 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Dec 25 09:40:50 CST 2023 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# # Current BPF sysctl settings:
# # /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable:1
# # /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden:0
# # Calibrating sample size for 15 seconds worth of syscalls ...
# # Benchmarking 37997130 syscalls...
# # 15.768643565 - 1.028667802 = 14739975763 (14.7s)
# # getpid native: 387 ns
# # 32.305042795 - 15.769439484 = 16535603311 (16.5s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): 435 ns
# # 48.595567892 - 32.307930690 = 16287637202 (16.3s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): 428 ns
# # 67.773953317 - 48.596835421 = 19177117896 (19.2s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): 504 ns
# # 88.068486378 - 67.774726217 = 20293760161 (20.3s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): 534 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter: 48 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters: 41 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters: 117 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters: 147 ns
# # Estimated seccomp entry overhead: 55 ns
# # Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff): 30 ns
# # Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (filters / 4): 23 ns
# # Expectations:
# # 	native ≤ 1 bitmap (387 ≤ 435): ✔️
# ok 1 native ≤ 1 bitmap
# # 	native ≤ 1 filter (387 ≤ 504): ✔️
# ok 2 native ≤ 1 filter
# # 	per-filter (last 2 diff) ≈ per-filter (filters / 4) (30 ≈ 23): ❌
# not ok 3 per-filter (last 2 diff) ≈ per-filter (filters / 4)
# # 	1 bitmapped ≈ 2 bitmapped (48 ≈ 41): ❌
# not ok 4 1 bitmapped ≈ 2 bitmapped
# # Skipping constant action bitmap expectations: they appear unsupported.
# ok 5 # SKIP entry ≈ 1 bitmapped
# ok 6 # SKIP entry ≈ 2 bitmapped
# ok 7 # SKIP native + entry + (per filter * 4) ≈ 4 filters total
# # Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?
# # Totals: pass:2 fail:2 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:3 error:0
not ok 2 selftests: seccomp: seccomp_benchmark # exit=1



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231227/202312271441.2e64d159-oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux