Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/4] bpf: support to track BPF_JNE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 21:47:56 +0800 you wrote:
> For now, the reg bounds is not handled for BPF_JNE case, which can cause
> the failure of following case:
> 
>   /* The type of "a" is u32 */
>   if (a > 0 && a < 100) {
>     /* the range of the register for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99],
>      * and will cause the following error:
>      *
>      *   invalid zero-sized read
>      *
>      * as a can be 0.
>      */
>     bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, xx, xx, a, 0);
>   }
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v5,1/4] bpf: make the verifier tracks the "not equal" for regs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d028f87517d6
  - [bpf-next,v5,2/4] selftests/bpf: remove reduplicated s32 casting in "crafted_cases"
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1de584832375
  - [bpf-next,v5,3/4] selftests/bpf: activate the OP_NE logic in range_cond()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/31d9cc96b1e3
  - [bpf-next,v5,4/4] selftests/bpf: add testcase to verifier_bounds.c for BPF_JNE
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/463ea64eb008

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux