On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 02:36:24AM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > Check that both active and passive reset works and correctly sign > segments with TCP-AO or don't send RSTs if not possible to sign. > A listening socket with backlog = 0 gets one connection in accept > queue, another in syn queue. Once the server/listener socket is > forcibly closed, client sockets aren't connected to anything. > In regular situation they would receive RST on any segment, but > with TCP-AO as there's no listener, no AO-key and unknown ISNs, > no RST should be sent. > > And "passive" reset, where RST is sent on reply for some segment > (tcp_v{4,6}_send_reset()) - there use TCP_REPAIR to corrupt SEQ numbers, > which later results in TCP-AO signed RST, which will be verified and > client socket will get EPIPE. > > No TCPAORequired/TCPAOBad segments are expected during these tests. > > Sample of the output: > > # ./rst_ipv4 > > 1..15 > > # 1462[lib/setup.c:254] rand seed 1686611171 > > TAP version 13 > > ok 1 servered 1000 bytes > > ok 2 Verified established tcp connection > > ok 3 sk[0] = 7, connection was reset > > ok 4 sk[1] = 8, connection was reset > > ok 5 sk[2] = 9 > > ok 6 MKT counters are good on server > > ok 7 Verified established tcp connection > > ok 8 client connection broken post-seq-adjust > > ok 9 client connection was reset > > ok 10 No segments without AO sign (server) > > ok 11 Signed AO segments (server): 0 => 30 > > ok 12 No segments with bad AO sign (server) > > ok 13 No segments without AO sign (client) > > ok 14 Signed AO segments (client): 0 => 30 > > ok 15 No segments with bad AO sign (client) > > # Totals: pass:15 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx>