Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] selftests: livepatch: Test livepatching a heavily called syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:

On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:

0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
style problems, please review.

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
        them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script
showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your
output?

I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's
missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset.


Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on
whether or not you would need a module name for this module?

I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In
this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There
is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please?


I see that now.

thanks,
-- Shuah










[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux