Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add a test to verify device probing on ACPI platforms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add a test to verify device probing on ACPI platforms
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:42:48 +0300
Cc: rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, lenb@xxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx, robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, kernelci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230925155806.1812249-1-laura.nao@collabora.com>

Your talk was interesting at Linux Plumbers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE73eVSyFXQ [time +2:35]

This is probably a stupid question, but why not just add something to
call_driver_probe() which creates a sysfs directory tree with all the
driver information?

regards,
dan carpenter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add a test to verify device probing on ACPI platforms
  - From: Laura Nao

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add a test to verify device probing on ACPI platforms
  - From: Laura Nao

Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 2/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Move the pmu helper function into lib/
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH RFT v3 0/5] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3()
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add a test to verify device probing on ACPI platforms
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Add a test to verify device probing on ACPI platforms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux