Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx" <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>, "broonie@xxxxxxxxxx" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Szabolcs.Nagy@xxxxxxx" <Szabolcs.Nagy@xxxxxxx>, "brauner@xxxxxxxxxx" <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, "dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mgorman@xxxxxxx" <mgorman@xxxxxxx>, "vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx" <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>, "fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx" <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "mingo@xxxxxxxxxx" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>, "tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx" <vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx>, "shuah@xxxxxxxxxx" <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, "bristot@xxxxxxxxxx" <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bp@xxxxxxxxx" <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, "bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx" <bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx" <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 18:16:52 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jannh@xxxxxxxxxx" <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>, "will@xxxxxxxxxx" <will@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Pandey, Sunil K" <sunil.k.pandey@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <309927ad8bfa72ce2d084ee16cd0cd84e69fef16.camel@intel.com>
Thread-index: AQHaFzYe+3PXY720NkO0CxBi0N1IArB6cYGAgARki4A=
Thread-topic: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support
User-agent: Evolution 3.44.4-0ubuntu2

On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 15:11 -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> The other tests passed in both cases. I'm going to dig into the other
> parts now but can circle back if it's not obvious what's going on
> there.

Finally got back to this. I think it's just a problem with the shadow
stack detection logic in the test.

References:
- [PATCH RFC RFT v2 0/5] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3()
  - From: Mark Brown
- [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support
  - From: Edgecombe, Rick P

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 2/5] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: Update multiple prog_tests to use ASSERT_ macros
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC RFT v2 5/5] kselftest/clone3: Test shadow stack support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]