Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 11:28:41 -0500
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20770915-nolibc-run-user-v1-0-3caec61726dc@weissschuh.net>

On Wed, Sep 15, 2077 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^

I'm curious how this happened, especially since this was sent with b4.

-K

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements
  - From: Thomas Weißschuh
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements
  - From: Willy Tarreau

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements
  - From: Thomas Weißschuh

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] selftests: sud_test: return correct emulated syscall value on RISC-V
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/nolibc: introduce QEMU_ARCH_USER
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/nolibc: run-user improvements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux