On 2023-11-05 11:32:27+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:09:57AM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > MIPS has many different configurations prepare the support of additional > > ones by moving the build of MIPS to the generic XARCH infrastructure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 12 +++++++----- > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile > > index c5df1617cbc3..15c12f3c27ba 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile > > @@ -40,12 +40,14 @@ objtree ?= $(srctree) > > > > # configure default variants for target kernel supported architectures > > XARCH_powerpc = ppc > > +XARCH_mips = mipso32le > > XARCH = $(or $(XARCH_$(ARCH)),$(ARCH)) > > > > # map from user input variants to their kernel supported architectures > > ARCH_ppc = powerpc > > ARCH_ppc64 = powerpc > > ARCH_ppc64le = powerpc > > +ARCH_mipso32le = mips > > I *think* that what you called "mipso32le" above corresponds exactly to > what is commonly called "mips32le" in toolchains or distros, because, > unless I'm mistaken, "mips32" currently uses the O32 ABI. So that would > sound more intuitive and natural I think. Ack. I did the same for mipso32be -> mips32be. Thomas
