Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Add printf attribute to kselftest functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-10-09 at 11:28:30 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>On 10/9/23 04:28, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
>> Kselftest.h declares many variadic functions that can print some
>> formatted message while also executing selftest logic. These
>> declarations don't have any compiler mechanism to verify if passed
>> arguments are valid in comparison with format specifiers used in
>> printf() calls.
>> 
>> Attribute addition can make debugging easier, the code more consistent
>> and prevent mismatched or missing variables.
>> 
>> Add a __printf() macro that validates types of variables passed to the
>> format string. The macro is similarly used in other tools in the kernel.
>> 
>> Add __printf() attributes to function definitions inside kselftest.h that
>> use printing.
>> 
>> Adding the __printf() macro exposes some mismatches in format strings
>> across different selftests.
>> 
>> Fix the mismatched format specifiers in multiple tests.
>> 
>> Series is based on kselftests next branch.
>
>How did you find these problems? I don't see any information
>how these problems are found in the commit logs.
>
>thanks,
>-- Shuah

I wrote the first patch that adds the check to functions with format
specifiers and I compiled all selftests. Then I just corrected any
warnings that were found by the __printf attribute.

Should I mention the methodology in the cover letter?

-- 
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux