Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] userfaultfd: UFFDIO_REMAP uABI

[Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

One more thing..

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 06:31:45PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> +static int remap_pages_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm,

[...]

> +retry:
> +	dst_pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_addr, &dst_ptl);
> +
> +	/* If an huge pmd materialized from under us fail */
> +	if (unlikely(!dst_pte)) {
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	src_pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(src_mm, src_pmd, src_addr, &src_ptl);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We held the mmap_lock for reading so MADV_DONTNEED
> +	 * can zap transparent huge pages under us, or the
> +	 * transparent huge page fault can establish new
> +	 * transparent huge pages under us.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(!src_pte)) {
> +		err = -EFAULT;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

For these two places: I know that thp collapse with mmap read lock hasn't
yet spread to anon (so I assume none of above could trigger yet on the
failure paths), but shall we constantly return -EAGAIN here just in case we
forget that in the future?

For example, for UFFDIO_COPY over shmem which we can already hit similar
case, mfill_atomic_install_pte() has:

	ret = -EAGAIN;
	dst_pte = pte_offset_map_lock(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_addr, &ptl);
	if (!dst_pte)
		goto out;

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu