On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 7:47 AM 'Jinjie Ruan' via KUnit Development
<kunit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not
> in the first iteration, the copy pointer has been moved. So it should free
> the original copy's backup copy_start.
>
> Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hello!
This looks good to me as well.
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
-Rae
> ---
> lib/kunit/executor.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> index a037a46fae5e..9358ed2df839 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set,
>
> free_copy:
> if (*err)
> - kfree(copy);
> + kfree(copy_start);
>
> return filtered;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20230914114629.1517650-3-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com.
