Re: [PATCH 3/4] tools/nolibc: don't define new syscall number

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 06:01:19PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> All symbols created by nolibc are also visible to user code.
> Syscall constants are expected to come from the kernel headers and
> should not be made up by nolibc.
> 
> Refactor the logic to avoid defining syscall numbers.
> Also the new code is easier to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yeah that's a good point!

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
Willy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux