On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:01 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 11:44:26AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 10:14 AM Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 9:24 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> > > > > +
> > > > > +enum guest_stage {
> > > > > + GUEST_STAGE_VTIMER_CVAL=1,
> > > > > + GUEST_STAGE_VTIMER_TVAL,
> > > > > + GUEST_STAGE_PTIMER_CVAL,
> > > > > + GUEST_STAGE_PTIMER_TVAL,
> > > > > + GUEST_STAGE_MAX,
> > > > > +};
> > > >
> > > > This enum also belongs in aarch64/arch_timer.c
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it should be in aarch64/arch_timer.c
> > >
> >
> > After moving the above enum definition to aarch64/arch_timer.c, the
> > below errors was reported
> > while compiling kvm/arch_timer.o
> >
> > include/timer_test.h:37:26: error: field ‘guest_stage’ has incomplete type
> > 37 | enum guest_stage guest_stage;
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Since kvm/arch_timer.c was independent of kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
> > during OBJ compiling,
> > I think it may be not possible to move the enum definition to
> > aarch64/arch_timer.c
> >
> > If we keep the definition in this header file, we can enclose it with
> > #ifdef __aarch64__ for aarch64 only.
> >
>
> Let's change struct test_vcpu_shared_data to
>
> struct test_vcpu_shared_data {
> int nr_iter;
> int guest_stage;
> uint64_t xcnt;
> };
>
> and then let the aarch64 code treat guest_stage as an enum and the riscv
> code can completely ignore it (no need to create an unused enum).
>
Good idea! Will fix it in v3.
> Thanks,
> drew
