On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 05:45:11PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > I don't mind the divergence in this area if the libc folks are ok with > it. x86 can eventually use the clone3() interface if they want more > flexibility, they'll just have to continue supporting the old one. I > think we already diverge around the prctl(). Yes, though that's basically the same thing - the difference is basically just that x86 uses their custom arch_prctl() thing and we use a regular prctl(), there's nothing conceptual going on like there is here. I don't really mind either, it's just something where I'd anticipate pushback.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
