Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: olsajiri@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache
From: Rong Tao <rtoax@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 09:39:32 +0800
Cc: andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx, mykolal@xxxxxx, rongtao@xxxxxxxx, rtoax@xxxxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <ZN3YeyMkgEg1IoKP@krava>

Hi, Jiri. Thanks for your reply.

libbpf_ensure_mem() is in libbpf_internal.h, samples/bpf/ can't see it, do we
reposition the function declaration?

Good Day
Rong Tao

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache
  - From: Jiri Olsa

References:
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache
  - From: Jiri Olsa

Prev by Date: [PATCH v3] selftests/ftrace: traceonoff_triggers: strip off names
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop bug
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5] selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: optimize kallsyms cache
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux