[bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix repeat option when kfunc_call verify fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is no way to set topts.repeat=1 when tc_test going to verify fail.

Maybe it's clerical error, fix it directly.

Fixes: fb66223a244f ("selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type")
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index a543742cd7bd..2eb71559713c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static void verify_fail(struct kfunc_test_params *param)
 	case tc_test:
 		topts.data_in = &pkt_v4;
 		topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4);
-		break;
 		topts.repeat = 1;
+		break;
 	}
 
 	skel = kfunc_call_fail__open_opts(&opts);
-- 
2.34.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux