[PATCH v6 2/6] KVM: selftests: Drop the return of remove_event()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@xxxxxxxxxxx>

None of the callers consume remove_event(), and it incorrectly implies
that the incoming filter isn't modified. Drop the return.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
index 40507ed9fe8a..5ac05e64bec9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -265,8 +265,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *event_filter(uint32_t action)
  * Remove the first occurrence of 'event' (if any) from the filter's
  * event list.
  */
-static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f,
-						 uint64_t event)
+static void remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f, uint64_t event)
 {
 	bool found = false;
 	int i;
@@ -279,7 +278,6 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *remove_event(struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f,
 	}
 	if (found)
 		f->nevents--;
-	return f;
 }
 
 #define ASSERT_PMC_COUNTING_INSTRUCTIONS()						\
-- 
2.39.3




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux