Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add mptcpify test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/3/23 6:55 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
Implement a new test program mptcpify: if the family is AF_INET or
AF_INET6, the type is SOCK_STREAM, and the protocol ID is 0 or
IPPROTO_TCP, set it to IPPROTO_MPTCP. It will be hooked in
update_socket_protocol().

Extend the MPTCP test base, add a selftest test_mptcpify() for the
mptcpify case. Open and load the mptcpify test prog to mptcpify the
TCP sockets dynamically, then use start_server() and connect_to_fd()
to create a TCP socket, but actually what's created is an MPTCP
socket, which can be verified through the outputs of 'ss' and 'nstat'
commands.

Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@xxxxxxxx>

Ack with a minor nit below.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>

---
  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c  | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcpify.c  | 20 +++++
  2 files changed, 108 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcpify.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 3dc0ba2e7590..e5ac2c3aab7d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
  #include "network_helpers.h"
  #include "mptcp_sock.skel.h"
+#include "mptcpify.skel.h"
char NS_TEST[32]; @@ -185,8 +186,95 @@ static void test_base(void)
  	close(cgroup_fd);
  }
+static void send_byte(int fd)
+{
+	char b = 0x55;
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(write(fd, &b, sizeof(b)), 1, "send single byte");
+}
+
+static int verify_mptcpify(void)
+{
+	char cmd[256];
+	int err = 0;
+
+	snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd),
+		 "ip netns exec %s ss -tOni | grep -q '%s'",
+		 NS_TEST, "tcp-ulp-mptcp");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), "No tcp-ulp-mptcp found!"))
+		err++;
+
+	snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd),
+		 "ip netns exec %s nstat -asz %s | awk '%s' | grep -q '%s'",
+		 NS_TEST, "MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNACKRX",
+		 "NR==1 {next} {print $2}", "1");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), "No MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNACKRX found!"))
+		err++;
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int run_mptcpify(int cgroup_fd)
+{
+	int server_fd, client_fd, err = 0;
+	struct mptcpify *mptcpify_skel;
+
+	mptcpify_skel = mptcpify__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(mptcpify_skel, "skel_open_load"))
+		return -EIO;
+
+	err = mptcpify__attach(mptcpify_skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
+		goto out;
+
+	/* without MPTCP */
+	server_fd = start_server(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, NULL, 0, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(server_fd, 0, "start_server")) {
+		err = -EIO;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(client_fd, 0, "connect to fd")) {
+		err = -EIO;
+		goto close_server;
+	}
+
+	send_byte(client_fd);
+	err += verify_mptcpify();

The above code essentially equals to
	err = verify_mptcpify()
since err must be 0 before the above code.
I think it is worthwhile to change the above to
	err = verify_mptcpify();

Otherwise, people may confuse that maybe err could be
non-zero before send_byte(client_fd)? If this is the
case, why we did not return earlier? The code
	err = verify_mptcpify()
will make it clear that all previous error
conditions have been handled properly.

+
+	close(client_fd);
+close_server:
+	close(server_fd);
+out:
+	mptcpify__destroy(mptcpify_skel);
+	return err;
+}
+
[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux