On 8/3/23 6:41 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
Implement a new test program mptcpify: if the family is AF_INET or
AF_INET6, the type is SOCK_STREAM, and the protocol ID is 0 or
IPPROTO_TCP, set it to IPPROTO_MPTCP. It will be hooked in
update_socket_protocol().
Extend the MPTCP test base, add a selftest test_mptcpify() for the
mptcpify case. Open and load the mptcpify test prog to mptcpify the
TCP sockets dynamically, then use start_server() and connect_to_fd()
to create a TCP socket, but actually what's created is an MPTCP
socket, which can be verified through the outputs of 'ss' and 'nstat'
commands.
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@xxxxxxxx>
---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcpify.c | 25 +++++
2 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/mptcpify.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index 4407bd5c9e9a..caab3aa6a162 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include "cgroup_helpers.h"
#include "network_helpers.h"
#include "mptcp_sock.skel.h"
+#include "mptcpify.skel.h"
char NS_TEST[32];
@@ -195,8 +196,101 @@ static void test_base(void)
close(cgroup_fd);
}
+static void send_byte(int fd)
+{
+ char b = 0x55;
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(write(fd, &b, sizeof(b)), 1, "send single byte");
+}
+
+static int verify_mptcpify(void)
+{
+ char cmd[256];
+ int err = 0;
+
+ snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd),
+ "ip netns exec %s ss -tOni | grep -q '%s'",
+ NS_TEST, "tcp-ulp-mptcp");
Could you show what is the expected output from the above command line
ip netns exec %s ss -tOni
?
This way, users can easily reason about the ss states based on tests.
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), "No tcp-ulp-mptcp found!"))
+ err++;
+
+ snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd),
+ "ip netns exec %s nstat -asz %s | awk '%s' | grep -q '%s'",
+ NS_TEST, "MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNACKRX",
+ "NR==1 {next} {print $2}", "1");
The same thing here. Could you show the expected output with
ip netns exec %s nstat -asz %s
?
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), "No MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNACKRX found!"))
+ err++;
+
+ return err;
+}
+
[...]
