> On Jul 28, 2023, at 3:25 PM, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/23 15:59, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>> On Jul 28, 2023, at 2:41 PM, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/28/23 15:21, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 28, 2023, at 12:44 PM, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/28/23 13:06, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/28/23 12:10, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2023, at 10:29 AM, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> proc_filter test requires root privileges. Add root privilege check
>>>>>>>> and skip the test. Also fix argument parsing paths to skip in their
>>>>>>>> error legs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c | 9 +++++++--
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c
>>>>>>>> index 4fe8c6763fd8..7b2081b98e5c 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/connector/proc_filter.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (argc > 2) {
>>>>>>>> printf("Expected 0(assume no-filter) or 1 argument(-f)\n");
>>>>>>>> - exit(1);
>>>>>>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (argc == 2) {
>>>>>>>> @@ -256,10 +256,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>>>>> filter = 1;
>>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>>> printf("Valid option : -f (for filter feature)\n");
>>>>>>>> - exit(1);
>>>>>>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + if (geteuid()) {
>>>>>>>> + printf("Connector test requires root privileges.\n");
>>>>>>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not sure why you have added this check? proc_filter does not need root privilege to run.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It failed for me when I ran it saying it requires root privileges.
>>>>>> I had to run it as root.
>>>>>
>>>>> The following is what I see when I run the test as non-root
>>>>> user:
>>>>>
>>>>> bind failed: Operation not permitted
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, that’s expected on a kernel which does not have the kernel patches submitted with this selftest installed on it.
>>>> So this check for root needs to be removed.
>>>
>>> I will send v2 for this patch without root check. I should have
>>> split the argument error paths and root check anyway.
>>>
>>> However, what is strange is if the test run by root, bind() doesn't fail.
>>> This doesn't make sense to me based on what you said about bind() fails
>>> if kernel doesn't support the new feature.
>>>
>> I didn’t say that - part of the changes introduced by the patches is to remove the root check and add some features on top of existing code.
>
> Okay. So what should happen if a root user runs this test on a kernel
> that doesn't have the kernel patches submitted with this selftest
> installed on it?
>
It will default to the behavior previous to my changes - that is it will report all events as opposed to a subset of events (which is the new feature added by my change)
Anjali
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
