On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:20:06PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote: > > +void vm_init_trap_vector_tables(struct kvm_vm *vm); > > +void vcpu_init_trap_vector_tables(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > I think we should use a common name for these prototypes that the other > architectures agree to and then put them in a common header. My vote for > the naming is, Just allocate the tables in kvm_arch_vm_post_create(). I've been meaning to convert x86 and ARM, but keep getting distracted/waylaid by other things. https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y8hCBOndYMD9zsDL@xxxxxxxxxx > void vm_init_vector_tables(struct kvm_vm *vm); > void vcpu_init_vector_tables(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > > > + > > +typedef void(*handler_fn)(struct ex_regs *); > > +void vm_install_exception_handler(struct kvm_vm *vm, int ec, handler_fn handler); > > I'd also put this typedef And rename it to (*exception_handler_fn). > and prototype in a common header (with s/ec/vector/ to what you have here) Hmm, yeah, I think it makes sense to let vm_install_exception_handler() be used from common code. the vector to be installed is inherently arch specific, but it would be easy enough for a test to use #ifdeffery to define the correct vector.
