On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:26 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 1 May 2023 17:52:16 -0700 Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h > > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h > > @@ -4033,7 +4033,7 @@ __skb_header_pointer(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int len, > > if (likely(hlen - offset >= len)) > > return (void *)data + offset; > > > > - if (!skb || unlikely(skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, buffer, len) < 0)) > > + if (!skb || !buffer || unlikely(skb_copy_bits(skb, offset, buffer, len) < 0)) > > return NULL; > > First off - please make sure you CC netdev on changes to networking! > > Please do not add stupid error checks to core code for BPF safety. > Wrap the call if you can't guarantee that value is sane, this is > a very bad precedent. This is NOT for safety. You misread the code.