Hi Willy, On 2023-06-08 00:15:27+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > after your recent discussions about the test output and report I > wondered if it would make sense to switch nolibc-test to KTAP output > format [0]. > > With this it would be possible to have a wrapper script run each > architecture test as its own test subcomponent. > A (K)TAP parser/runner could then directly recognize and report failing > testcases, making it easier to validate. > > Also maybe we can hook it up into the regular kselftests setup and have > the bots run it as part of that. > > The kernel even includes a header-only library to implement the format [1]. > It also should be fairly easy to emit the format without a library. Did you have a chance to look at this? If you are not categorically opposed I would create a proof of concept for further discussion. > [0] Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst > [1] Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst (Test harness)
