On 7/14/23 11:32, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 7/14/23 12:26, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:19:11 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 7/14/23 11:09, Mark Brown wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:48:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>>> On 7/13/23 14:16, John Hubbard wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Actually, I was hoping that my two fixes [1], [2] could be used, instead >>>>>> of reverting the feature. >>>> >>>>> Mark! Are you good with taking these two - do these fix the >>>>> problems you are seeing? >>>> >>>> I reviewed the one that's relevant to me already, the arm64 one, I'd not >>>> seen or tested the RISC-V one but that looks fine too. I'm pretty sure >>> >>> That riscv patch already has a Tested-by from Alexandre Ghiti: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/f903634d-851f-af64-8d9a-6b13d813587c@xxxxxxxx >>> >>> >>>> Andrew queued it already though ICBW. Either way it'd be good to get >>>> this into -rc2, this is seriously disrupting arm64 CI and I'm guessing >>>> the RISC-V CI too. >>> >> >> I just dropped >> selftests-arm64-fix-build-failure-during-the-emit_tests-step.patch and >> selftests-fix-arm64-test-installation.patch, as Shuah is merging them. >> >> This is all rather confusing. Perhaps a full resend of everything will >> help. I'll assume that Shuah will be handling them. > > Yes. Andrew - I am applying both as we speak. I found the right versions > with Tested-by tags. Thanks, Shuah. Just to be clear, when you say you're applying "both", I'm hoping you mean both of these: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230711005629.2547838-1-jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230712193514.740033-1-jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx/ ? (As opposed to both of the ones that Andrew lists above.) thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA
