Re: [PATCH v4 06/19] selftests/resctrl: Move resctrl FS mount/umount to higher level

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ilpo,

On 7/13/2023 6:19 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> A few places currently lack umounting resctrl FS on error paths:
>   - cmt_resctrl_val() has multiple error paths with direct return.
>   - cat_perf_miss_val() has multiple error paths with direct return.
> In addition, validate_resctrl_feature_request() is called by
> run_mbm_test() and run_mba_test(). Neither MBA nor MBM test tries to
> umount resctrl FS.
> 
> Each and every test does require resctrl FS to be present already for
> feature check. Thus, it makes sense to just mount it on higher level in
> resctrl_tests.c and properly pair it with umount.
> 
> Move resctrl FS (re)mount/unmount into each test function in
> resctrl_tests.c. Make feature validation to simply check that resctrl
> FS is mounted.
> 
> Fixes: 91db4fd9019a ("selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate codes that clear each test result file")

Could you please elaborate how this commit is the culprit?


Reinette



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux