On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 02:17:01 +0000
Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Jul 9, 2023, at 6:54 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > + union {
> > + struct rcu_head rcu;
> > + struct llist_node llist; /* For freeing after RCU */
> > + };
>
> The memory savings from using a union might not be worth the potential impact
> of type confusion and bugs.
It's also documentation. The two are related, as one is the hand off to
the other. It's not a random union, and I'd like to leave it that way.
-- Steve
