On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:23 PM Minjie Du <duminjie@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Delete a duplicate assignment from this function implementation.
> The note means ppm is average of the two actual freq samples.
> But ppm have a duplicate assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/timers/raw_skew.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/raw_skew.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/raw_skew.c
> index 5beceeed0..6eba203f9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/raw_skew.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/raw_skew.c
> @@ -129,8 +129,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> printf("%lld.%i(est)", eppm/1000, abs((int)(eppm%1000)));
>
> /* Avg the two actual freq samples adjtimex gave us */
> - ppm = (tx1.freq + tx2.freq) * 1000 / 2;
> - ppm = (long long)tx1.freq * 1000;
> + ppm = (long long)(tx1.freq + tx2.freq) * 1000 / 2;
Huh. So yeah, I looked back in my own history and this has been there
forever. I'm guessing I was intending to average the two samples and
then due to reasons I can't remember decided to just use the first in
the short-term for some debugging (with the second assignment) and
committed both.
I think it should be safe, because if the freq values are not the same
the test will return SKIP, so it's unlikely changing this would cause
new test failures.
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for noticing this and sending this out!
-john
