For CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, the /proc is not mountable, but the /proc
directory has been created in the prepare() stage whenever /proc is
there or not.
so, the checking of /proc in the run_syscall() stage will be always true
and at last it will fail all of the procfs dependent test cases, which
deviates from the 'cond' check design of the EXPECT_xx macros, without
procfs, these test cases should be skipped instead of failed.
To solve this issue, one method is checking /proc/self instead of /proc,
another method is removing the /proc directory completely for
CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, we apply the second method to avoid misleading the
users.
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index 2725d3dbfaf0..c0f5302ada5d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -1047,8 +1047,11 @@ int prepare(void)
/* try to mount /proc if not mounted. Silently fail otherwise */
if (stat("/proc/.", &stat_buf) == 0 || mkdir("/proc", 0755) == 0) {
- if (stat("/proc/self", &stat_buf) != 0)
- mount("/proc", "/proc", "proc", 0, 0);
+ if (stat("/proc/self", &stat_buf) != 0) {
+ /* If not mountable, remove /proc completely to avoid misuse */
+ if (mount("none", "/proc", "proc", 0, 0) != 0)
+ rmdir("/proc");
+ }
}
return 0;
--
2.25.1
