Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuset: Allow setscheduler regardless of manipulated task

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/29/23 08:26, Michal Koutný wrote:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:11:33AM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So I think you should just use
cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(cpuset_cgrp_subsys) as the v2 check if your focus
is just to prevent problem when enabling cpuset controller.
I thought the bare cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(cpuset_cgrp_subsys) is not used
in cpuset.c but I was wrong -- yes, I'll change this.

This change will likely conflict with the latest cpuset change on tracking #
of dl tasks in a cpuset. You will have to, at least, move the dl task check
before the security_task_setscheduler() check.

Another fact about cpuset controller enabling is that both cpus_allowed and
mems_allowed are empty at that point. You may also add these checks as a
preconditions for disabling the security_task_setscheduler check.
Ah, I will rebase on fresh mainline (or do you mean another reference?).

Yes, those changes have just been merged into the mainline.

Cheers,
Longman




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux