Hi Shuah, Gentle ping for this On lun, may 15 2023 at 11:43:10, Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there a downside to that? There'll be some tests that take more time, > I don't think that's a problem with the tests or a reason to let them > timeout. IMO it's the test framework which should adapt to the needs of > different types of tests, and the solution provided by this patch is > good enough, it addresses the problem for this particular test suite. > > If the solution is still unacceptable, do you have an alternative > proposal in mind that we can try to implement? There are some tests failing because of this and we're trying to address these problems to clean up the regression results. Thanks, Ricardo
