Arnd, Thomas, Willy
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023, at 11:05, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > Both riscv64 and riscv32 have:
> >
> > * the same ARCH value, it is riscv
> > * the same arch/riscv source code tree
> >
> > The only differences are:
> >
> > * riscv64 uses defconfig, riscv32 uses rv32_defconfig
> > * riscv64 uses qemu-system-riscv64, riscv32 uses qemu-system-riscv32
> > * riscv32 has different compiler options (-march= and -mabi=)
> >
> > So, riscv32 can share most of the settings with riscv64, there is no
> > need to add it as a whole new architecture but just need a flag to
> > record and reflect the difference.
> >
> > The 32bit mips and loongarch may be able to use the same method, so,
> > let's use a meaningful flag: CONFIG_32BIT. If required in the future,
> > this flag can also be automatically loaded from
> > include/config/auto.conf.
>
> If we use a CONFIG_* symbol, I think it should be the other way
> round, for consistency with the kernel, which uses CONFIG_64BIT
> on all architectures, but only uses CONFIG_32BIT on mips, loongarch
> powerpc and riscv.
>
>
> > # kernel image names by architecture
> > IMAGE_i386 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> > IMAGE_x86_64 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> > @@ -34,7 +40,7 @@ DEFCONFIG_x86 = defconfig
> > DEFCONFIG_arm64 = defconfig
> > DEFCONFIG_arm = multi_v7_defconfig
> > DEFCONFIG_mips = malta_defconfig
> > -DEFCONFIG_riscv = defconfig
> > +DEFCONFIG_riscv = $(if $(CONFIG_32BIT),rv32_defconfig,defconfig)
> > DEFCONFIG_s390 = defconfig
> > DEFCONFIG_loongarch = defconfig
> > DEFCONFIG = $(DEFCONFIG_$(ARCH))
>
> This feels slightly odd, as we otherwise have a fixed defconfig
> per target, so doing
>
> DEFCONFIG_riscv = defconfig
> DEFCONFIG_riscv64 = defconfig
> DEFCONFIG_riscv32 = rv32_defconfig
>
> would seem more consistent with how x86 is handled, and would
> probably be more easily extensible if we want to also make
> this work with other sub-targets like mipseb, armv5 or ppc32
> in the future.
As Arnd and Thomas suggested to align with x86, I just tried to find a
solution to avoid mixing the use of _ARCH and ARCH in this Makefile.
Since both riscv32 and riscv64 share the same SRCARCH=riscv (arch/riscv),
and the kernel side doesn't accept riscv32 or riscv64 currently, we need to
manually convert them to _ARCH=riscv and pass them to the kernel makefile
like this: ARCH=$(_ARCH), it mixes the use of _ARCH and ARCH, this is why I
used the '$(if' method currently.
The solution is adding something like x86 in the kernel Makefile:
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 9d765ebcccf1..a442c893d795 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -415,6 +415,14 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),parisc64)
SRCARCH := parisc
endif
+# Additional ARCH settings for riscv
+ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv32)
+ SRCARCH := riscv
+endif
+ifeq ($(ARCH),riscv64)
+ SRCARCH := riscv
+endif
+
export cross_compiling :=
ifneq ($(SRCARCH),$(SUBARCH))
cross_compiling := 1
And also, we need to let both of them use the arch-riscv.h in
tools/include/nolibc/Makefile:
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/include/nolibc/Makefile
index 64d67b080744..459eaddb230f 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Q=@
endif
nolibc_arch := $(patsubst arm64,aarch64,$(ARCH))
+nolibc_arch := $(patsubst riscv%,riscv,$(ARCH))
arch_file := arch-$(nolibc_arch).h
all_files := \
compiler.h \
So, the left parts can be added like x86 too:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index 4a3a105e1fdf..1b2247a6365d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ IMAGE_x86 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
IMAGE_arm64 = arch/arm64/boot/Image
IMAGE_arm = arch/arm/boot/zImage
IMAGE_mips = vmlinuz
+IMAGE_riscv32 = arch/riscv/boot/Image
+IMAGE_riscv64 = arch/riscv/boot/Image
IMAGE_riscv = arch/riscv/boot/Image
IMAGE_s390 = arch/s390/boot/bzImage
IMAGE_loongarch = arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz.efi
@@ -34,6 +36,8 @@ DEFCONFIG_x86 = defconfig
DEFCONFIG_arm64 = defconfig
DEFCONFIG_arm = multi_v7_defconfig
DEFCONFIG_mips = malta_defconfig
+DEFCONFIG_riscv32 = rv32_defconfig
+DEFCONFIG_riscv64 = defconfig
DEFCONFIG_riscv = defconfig
DEFCONFIG_s390 = defconfig
DEFCONFIG_loongarch = defconfig
@@ -49,6 +53,8 @@ QEMU_ARCH_x86 = x86_64
QEMU_ARCH_arm64 = aarch64
QEMU_ARCH_arm = arm
QEMU_ARCH_mips = mipsel # works with malta_defconfig
+QEMU_ARCH_riscv32 = riscv32
+QEMU_ARCH_riscv64 = riscv64
QEMU_ARCH_riscv = riscv64
QEMU_ARCH_s390 = s390x
QEMU_ARCH_loongarch = loongarch64
@@ -61,6 +67,8 @@ QEMU_ARGS_x86 = -M pc -append "console=ttyS0,9600 i8042.noaux panic=-1 $(
QEMU_ARGS_arm64 = -M virt -cpu cortex-a53 -append "panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
QEMU_ARGS_arm = -M virt -append "panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
QEMU_ARGS_mips = -M malta -append "panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
+QEMU_ARGS_riscv32 = -M virt -append "console=ttyS0 panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
+QEMU_ARGS_riscv64 = -M virt -append "console=ttyS0 panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
QEMU_ARGS_riscv = -M virt -append "console=ttyS0 panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
QEMU_ARGS_s390 = -M s390-ccw-virtio -m 1G -append "console=ttyS0 panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
QEMU_ARGS_loongarch = -M virt -append "console=ttyS0,115200 panic=-1 $(TEST:%=NOLIBC_TEST=%)"
@@ -76,6 +84,7 @@ else
Q=@
endif
+CFLAGS_riscv32 = -march=rv32im -mabi=ilp32
CFLAGS_s390 = -m64
CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR ?= $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all))
CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -std=c89 \
And just found the 'm' extension (-march=rv32im) is necessary to avoid linking
libgcc, especially, my local compiler has no rv32 libgcc (target emulation
`elf64-littleriscv' does not match `elf32-littleriscv'), so, added the 'm'
extension back, this is supported by the generic riscv chips. The atomic and
float extensions (include single and double) are not added, keep it as minimal
currently.
Just tested rv32 and rv64 on 20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a with a trivial fixup
of rcu (the problematic code is not in v6.4-rc4, so, this can be ignored, see
below, what about rebase the new branch on a newer rc?), it works as expected.
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index ce02bb09651b..72bd8fe0cad6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1934,11 +1934,13 @@ void show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads(void)
}
#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_TINY_RCU */
+#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
struct task_struct *get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread(void)
{
return rcu_tasks.kthread_ptr;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread);
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
struct rcu_tasks_test_desc {
The steps I tested:
$ history | grep make
// riscv32 test
1416 make defconfig ARCH=riscv32 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
1430 make run ARCH=riscv32 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- QEMU_ARGS_EXTRA="-bios /labs/linux-lab/opensbi-riscv32-generic-fw_dynamic.bin"
1438 make run-user ARCH=riscv32 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
113 test(s) passed, 3 skipped, 22 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out
// riscv64 test (old options)
1432 make defconfig ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
1433 make run ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
1443 make run-user ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
135 test(s) passed, 3 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out
// riscv64 test (new options)
1441 make run ARCH=riscv64 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
1439 make run-user ARCH=riscv64 CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu-
Thanks Arnd and Thomas for your persistence, If you agree, will send this as a
new revision.
@Willy, I plan to send v4 immediately, since the first two has not been
merged yet, so, I will send them together as v4.
Best regards,
Zhangjin
>
> Arnd
