Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Optimize mremap during mutual alignment within PMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Optimize mremap during mutual alignment within PMD
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 19:33:23 -0400
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx>, Kirill A Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Liam R. Howlett" <liam.howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230531220807.2048037-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:08 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Here is v4 of the mremap start address optimization / fix for exec warning.

I don't see anything suspicious here.

Not that that probably means much, but the test coverage looks reasonable too.

            Linus

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/7] Optimize mremap during mutual alignment within PMD
  - From: Joel Fernandes (Google)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] cgroup/cpuset: Documentation update for partition
Next by Date: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 7/7] selftests: mm: Add a test for moving from an offset from start of mapping
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix elem_size not being set for inner maps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]