Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/2] Add nolocalbypass option to vxlan.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue,  2 May 2023 00:25:29 +0800
Vladimir Nikishkin <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If a packet needs to be encapsulated towards a local destination IP and
> a VXLAN device that matches the destination port and VNI exists, then
> the packet will be injected into the Rx path as if it was received by
> the target VXLAN device without undergoing encapsulation. If such a
> device does not exist, the packet will be dropped.
> 
> There are scenarios where we do not want to drop such packets and
> instead want to let them be encapsulated and locally received by a user
> space program that post-processes these VXLAN packets.
> 
> To that end, add a new VXLAN device attribute that controls whether such
> packets are dropped or not. When set ("localbypass") these packets are
> dropped and when unset ("nolocalbypass") the packets are encapsulated
> and locally delivered to the listening user space application. Default
> to "localbypass" to maintain existing behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Nikishkin <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Is there some way to use BPF for this. Rather than a special case
for some userspace program?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux