Re: [PATCH tracing 0/3] tracing: support > 8 byte filter predicates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/04/2023 18:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:15:03 +0100
> Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> that's a great idea; what would be the most consistent ftrace syntax
>> for this do you think? I noticed that hist triggers append a modifier
>> to the field name so would something like
>>
>> "dst.ipv6 == ::1"
> 
> Yeah, I think just having ":" in the name without quotes can help the filter
> know that it's a ipv6 id.
> 
> Hmm, although we may want to do the same for mac addresses. But we can
> determine the difference by the field size. If it's 6 bytes, it's a mac, if
> it's 128 bits, then ipv6.
>

good idea! so what about the following

- 16 byte field with ':'; convert from IPv6 address before memcmp()ing
- 6 byte field with ':'; convert from MAC address before memcmp()ing
- 4 byte field with '.'; convert from IPv4 address before memcmp()ing
- 0x prefix, any other size; basic memcmp

? Thanks!

Alan
 
> -- Steve
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux