On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:31:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > It seems like more of a kselftest change than anything else so probably > > makes sense for it to go that way? The example user isn't really even > > needed. > Fine by me, as long as it doesn't conflict with any other arm64 selftest > changes you hope to land for 6.4. That shouldn't be an issue.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
