vfprintf() is complex and so far did not have proper tests.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index 47013b78972e..de943e028933 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <sys/io.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <sys/mount.h>
#include <sys/reboot.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -667,6 +668,90 @@ int run_stdlib(int min, int max)
return ret;
}
+#define EXPECT_VFPRINTF(c, expected, fmt, ...) \
+ ret += expect_vfprintf(llen, c, expected, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+static int expect_vfprintf(int llen, size_t c, const char *expected, const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ int ret, fd, w, r;
+ char buf[100];
+ FILE *memfile;
+ va_list args;
+
+ fd = memfd_create("vfprintf", 0);
+ if (fd == -1) {
+ pad_spc(llen, 64, "[FAIL]\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ memfile = fdopen(fd, "w+");
+ if (!memfile) {
+ pad_spc(llen, 64, "[FAIL]\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ va_start(args, fmt);
+ w = vfprintf(memfile, fmt, args);
+ va_end(args);
+
+ if (w != c) {
+ llen += printf(" written(%d) != %d", w, (int) c);
+ pad_spc(llen, 64, "[FAIL]\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ fflush(memfile);
+ lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
+
+ r = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1);
+ buf[r] = '\0';
+
+ fclose(memfile);
+
+ if (r != w) {
+ llen += printf(" written(%d) != read(%d)", w, r);
+ pad_spc(llen, 64, "[FAIL]\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ llen += printf(" \"%s\" = \"%s\"", expected, buf);
+ ret = strncmp(expected, buf, c);
+
+ pad_spc(llen, 64, ret ? "[FAIL]\n" : " [OK]\n");
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int run_vfprintf(int min, int max)
+{
+ int test;
+ int tmp;
+ int ret = 0;
+ void *p1, *p2;
+
+ for (test = min; test >= 0 && test <= max; test++) {
+ int llen = 0; // line length
+
+ /* avoid leaving empty lines below, this will insert holes into
+ * test numbers.
+ */
+ switch (test + __LINE__ + 1) {
+ CASE_TEST(empty); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(0, "", ""); break;
+ CASE_TEST(simple); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(3, "foo", "foo"); break;
+ CASE_TEST(string); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(3, "foo", "%s", "foo"); break;
+ CASE_TEST(number); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(4, "1234", "%d", 1234); break;
+ CASE_TEST(negnumber); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(5, "-1234", "%d", -1234); break;
+ CASE_TEST(unsigned); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(5, "12345", "%u", 12345); break;
+ CASE_TEST(char); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(1, "c", "%c", 'c'); break;
+ CASE_TEST(hex); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(1, "f", "%x", 0xf); break;
+ CASE_TEST(pointer); EXPECT_VFPRINTF(3, "0x1", "%p", (void *) 0x1); break;
+ case __LINE__:
+ return ret; /* must be last */
+ /* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
+ }
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int smash_stack(void)
{
char buf[100];
@@ -774,6 +859,7 @@ static const struct test test_names[] = {
/* add new tests here */
{ .name = "syscall", .func = run_syscall },
{ .name = "stdlib", .func = run_stdlib },
+ { .name = "vfprintf", .func = run_vfprintf },
{ .name = "protection", .func = run_protection },
{ 0 }
};
--
2.40.0
