> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: czwartek, 30 marca 2023 11:56 > To: Drewek, Wojciech <wojciech.drewek@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub > Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: selftests: net: l2tp.sh regression starting with 6.1-rc1 > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:26:06AM +0000, Drewek, Wojciech wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: czwartek, 30 marca 2023 08:45 > > > To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Drewek, Wojciech <wojciech.drewek@xxxxxxxxx>; David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet > > > <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Shuah Khan > <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: selftests: net: l2tp.sh regression starting with 6.1-rc1 > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 03:39:13PM +0000, Drewek, Wojciech wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > -MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_TYPE(PF_INET6, 2, IPPROTO_L2TP); > > > > > > -MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO(PF_INET6, IPPROTO_L2TP); > > > > > > +MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_TYPE(PF_INET6, 2, 115 /* IPPROTO_L2TP */); > > > > > > +MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO(PF_INET6, 115 /* IPPROTO_L2TP */); > > > > > > > > > > Btw, am I blind or the alias with type was wrong the whole time? > > > > > pf goes first, then proto and type at the end according to the definition of MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_TYPE > > > > > and here type (2) is 2nd and proto (115) is 3rd > > > > > > > > You're not blind :). The MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO_TYPE(...) is indeed > > > > wrong. Auto-loading the l2tp_ip and l2tp_ip6 modules only worked > > > > because of the extra MODULE_ALIAS_NET_PF_PROTO() declaration (as > > > > inet_create() and inet6_create() fallback to "net-pf-%d-proto-%d" if > > > > "net-pf-%d-proto-%d-type-%d" fails). > > > > > > At this point I think using 115 directly is probably the best solution, > > > that is also what we do already with SOCK_DGRAM, but I would just update > > > the comment up above, instead of adding the inline comments. > > > > Agree, > > > > I verified the fix on my machine, > > Do you want me to send the patch or you'll just send below one? > > Sent already. :) > > -Andrea Thank you!
