On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 11:34 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:31:57AM -0700, Evan Green wrote: > > Hey Evan, > > Patchwork has a rake of complaints about the series unfortunately: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=734234 > > Some of the checkpatch whinging may be spurious, but there's some > definitely valid stuff in there! > > > Evan Green (6): > > RISC-V: Move struct riscv_cpuinfo to new header > > RISC-V: Add a syscall for HW probing > > RISC-V: hwprobe: Add support for RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA > > RISC-V: hwprobe: Support probing of misaligned access performance > > selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface > > > RISC-V: Add hwprobe vDSO function and data > > And this one breaks the build for !MMU kernels unfortunately. Drat! Ok, thanks for the heads up. I'll go track these down. -Evan
