From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
The two infinite loops in bound check cases added by commit
1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range")
increased the execution time of test_verifier from about 6 seconds to
about 9 seconds. Rewrite these two infinite loops to finite loops to get
rid of this extra time cost.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- rewrite the infinite loops to finite loops instead of removing the
test cases
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230327153538.850440-1-xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 24 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
index 74b1917d4208..43942ce8cf15 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
@@ -784,22 +784,26 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 8),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 13),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffffffffffff10),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, 0x8000000000000fff),
BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x8000000000000000),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 3),
/* r1 signed range is [S64_MIN, S64_MAX] */
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -3),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "BPF program is too large",
- .result = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
},
{
@@ -856,21 +860,25 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 6),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 10),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffff10),
BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0x80000fff),
BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x80000000),
BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 3),
/* r1 signed range is [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] */
- BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2),
+ BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -3),
+
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .errstr = "BPF program is too large",
- .result = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
},
--
2.30.2
