[PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Remove two infinite loop bound check cases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>

The two infinite loop bound check cases added by commit
1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range")
take a long time to execute but don't add much value.

Remove them to reduce run time of test_verifier.

Fixes: 1a3148fc171f ("selftests/bpf: Check when bounds are not in the 32-bit range")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 50 -------------------
 1 file changed, 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
index 74b1917d4208..515a8222f08f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c
@@ -777,31 +777,6 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 },
-{
-	"bound check with JMP_JSLT for crossing 64-bit signed boundary",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 8),
-
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffffffffffff10),
-	BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
-
-	BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x8000000000000000),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
-	/* r1 signed range is [S64_MIN, S64_MAX] */
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2),
-
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "BPF program is too large",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
-},
 {
 	"bound check for loop upper bound greater than U32_MAX",
 	.insns = {
@@ -849,28 +824,3 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
 },
-{
-	"bound check with JMP32_JSLT for crossing 32-bit signed boundary",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 6),
-
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x7fffff10),
-	BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
-
-	BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x80000000),
-	BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 1),
-	/* r1 signed range is [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] */
-	BPF_JMP32_REG(BPF_JSLT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -2),
-
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "BPF program is too large",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
-},
-- 
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux