Hello,
On 24/03/2023 18:11, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Only the in-kernel PM uses the number of address and subflow limits
> allowed per connection.
>
> It then makes more sense not to display such info when other PMs are
> used not to confuse the userspace by showing limits not being used.
>
> While at it, we can get rid of the "val" variable and add indentations
> instead.
>
> It would have been good to have done this modification directly in
> commit 3fd4c2a2d672 ("mptcp: bypass in-kernel PM restrictions for non-kernel PMs")
I'm sorry, I just noticed I picked the wrong SHA for this commit and my
scripts only checked the ones mentioned in the "Fixes" tags. We should
have this instead:
> commit 4d25247d3ae4 ("mptcp: bypass in-kernel PM restrictions for non-kernel PMs")
I can send a v2 later to fix the SHA if there is no other comments.
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
