When reporting errors or skips we currently include the diagnostic message
indicating why we're failing or skipping. This isn't ideal since KTAP
defines the entire print as the test name, so if there's an error then test
systems won't detect the test as being the same one as a passing test. Move
the diagnostic to a separate ksft_print_msg() to avoid this issue, the test
name part will always be the same for passes, fails and skips and the
diagnostic information is still displayed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c
index 58b525a4a32c..bab56ea67e89 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c
@@ -489,17 +489,18 @@ static void test_pcm_time(struct pcm_data *data, enum test_class class,
}
if (!skip)
- ksft_test_result(pass, "%s.%s.%d.%d.%d.%s%s%s\n",
+ ksft_test_result(pass, "%s.%s.%d.%d.%d.%s\n",
test_class_name, test_name,
data->card, data->device, data->subdevice,
- snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream),
- msg[0] ? " " : "", msg);
+ snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream));
else
- ksft_test_result_skip("%s.%s.%d.%d.%d.%s%s%s\n",
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s.%s.%d.%d.%d.%s\n",
test_class_name, test_name,
data->card, data->device, data->subdevice,
- snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream),
- msg[0] ? " " : "", msg);
+ snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream));
+
+ if (msg[0])
+ ksft_print_msg("%s\n", msg);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&results_lock);
---
base-commit: e8d018dd0257f744ca50a729e3d042cf2ec9da65
change-id: 20230323-alsa-pcm-test-names-bcd31b586ca9
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
