Re: [PATCH 09/14] iommufd: Add iommufd_device_replace()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 11:01:59AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 2/25/23 8:27 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > @@ -437,25 +517,77 @@ int iommufd_device_attach(struct iommufd_device *idev, u32 *pt_id)
> >   		struct iommufd_ioas *ioas =
> >   			container_of(pt_obj, struct iommufd_ioas, obj);
> > -		rc = iommufd_device_auto_get_domain(idev, ioas, pt_id);
> > -		if (rc)
> > +		destroy_hwpt = iommufd_device_auto_get_domain(idev, ioas, pt_id,
> > +							      do_attach);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(destroy_hwpt))
> >   			goto out_put_pt_obj;
> >   		break;
> >   	}
> >   	default:
> > -		rc = -EINVAL;
> > +		destroy_hwpt = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >   		goto out_put_pt_obj;
> >   	}
> > +	iommufd_put_object(pt_obj);
> > -	refcount_inc(&idev->obj.users);
> > -	rc = 0;
> > +	/* This destruction has to be after we unlock everything */
> > +	if (destroy_hwpt)
> 
> Should this be
> 
> 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(destroy_hwpt))
> 
> ?

Never use IS_ERR_OR_NULL ..

What am I missing? all the flows that could possibly have err_ptr here
do goto_out_put_pt_obj ?

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux