Hi Isabella, On Monday, 19 September 2022 22:55:44 CET Isabella Basso wrote: > Hi, Janusz, > > > Am 09/09/2022 um 12:18 PM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > ... > > > > Anyway, related to my comment about naming that function a parser, I think the > > best approach would be for that parser to return a generic set of results from > > kunit execution, then we could feed that data into an IGT specific handler > > that would convert them to IGT results (SUCCESS, FAIL, or SKIP) as if returned > > by a set of IGT dynamic subtests. > > That sounds like a good idea to me, I might take some extra time before v3 to > do that, though. Were you able to make any progress? Do you need any help? Thanks, Janusz
