On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 12:14:55PM -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/libc.S
> +.global _start
> +_start:
> +.option push
> +.option norelax
> + la gp, __global_pointer$
> +.option pop
> +
> + la sp, stack
> +
> + la t0, heap
> + la t1, brk
> + REG_S t0, 0(t1)
> +
> + li a0, 0
> + li a1, 0
> +
> + call main
This looks like it's just a standard program entry but I don't speak
RISC-V asm so I might be missing something. If that's the case might it
make sense to use nolibc here?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
