RE: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:07:18 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86 Mailing List <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kselftest Mailing List <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Y9DpNG+jb8G/lhA1@biznet-home.integral.gnuweeb.org>
Thread-index: AQHZMHAoqvs/lwdyjkiVXoNdsc7iCK6uxqlQgAAHsQCAAI69wA==
Thread-topic: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture

> > This version passes on FRED, thanks a lot for quickly fixing it.
> 
> Great!
> 
> Can you pick these two patches and include it in the next version of
> "x86: enable FRED for x86-64" RFC patchset?

Would it be better to get this patch set merged first?

Otherwise surely I will include it in the FRED patch set.

  Xin

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
  - From: H. Peter Anvin

References:
- [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip update for FRED system
  - From: Ammar Faizi
- [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Add more syscall tests with respect to `%rcx` and `%r11`
  - From: Ammar Faizi
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Add more syscall tests with respect to `%rcx` and `%r11`
  - From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Add more syscall tests with respect to `%rcx` and `%r11`
  - From: Ammar Faizi
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Add more syscall tests with respect to `%rcx` and `%r11`
  - From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/x86: sysret_rip: Add more syscall tests with respect to `%rcx` and `%r11`
  - From: Ammar Faizi
- [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
  - From: Ammar Faizi
- RE: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
  - From: Li, Xin3
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
  - From: Ammar Faizi

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: amd-pstate: Don't delete source files via Makefile
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: net: Fix missing nat6to4.o when running udpgro_frglist.sh
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
Next by thread: RE: [RFC PATCH v5 0/2] sysret_rip update for the Intel FRED architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]