Hello Daniel.
Thank you very much for your review!
Could you advise me whom I can address the V2 patch "to"?
Best, Alex.
ср, 18 янв. 2023 г. в 01:56, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 1:05 PM Alexander Pantyukhin
> <apantykhin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The build_tests function contained the doulbe checking for not success
>
> very nit: if we're fixing the "doulbe" typo, can we also do
> "the doulbe" => "double" (drop the "the")
>
> > result. It is fixed in the current patch. Additional small
> > simplifications of code like useing ternary if were applied (avoid use
> > the same operation by calculation times differ in two places).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Pantyukhin <apantykhin@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks!
> I can't believe we never noticed the duplicate `if not success` blocks
> before now.
>
> Some minor suggestions below if we're already going to send a v2 out for typos.
>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 17 +++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> > index 43fbe96318fe..481c213818bd 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> > @@ -77,10 +77,8 @@ def config_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> > config_start = time.time()
> > success = linux.build_reconfig(request.build_dir, request.make_options)
> > config_end = time.time()
> > - if not success:
> > - return KunitResult(KunitStatus.CONFIG_FAILURE,
> > - config_end - config_start)
> > - return KunitResult(KunitStatus.SUCCESS,
> > + status = KunitStatus.SUCCESS if success else KunitStatus.CONFIG_FAILURE
> > + return KunitResult(status,
> > config_end - config_start)
>
> nit: perhaps we can shorten this to one line, i.e.
> return KunitResult(status, config_end - config_start)
>
> >
> > def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> > @@ -92,13 +90,8 @@ def build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> > request.build_dir,
> > request.make_options)
> > build_end = time.time()
> > - if not success:
> > - return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
> > - build_end - build_start)
> > - if not success:
> > - return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
> > - build_end - build_start)
>
> Oh huh, I guess this duplication comes from commit 45ba7a893ad8
> ("kunit: kunit_tool: Separate out config/build/exec/parse")
>
> @@ -64,78 +84,167 @@ def run_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> build_end = time.time()
> if not success:
> return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE, 'could
> not build kernel')
> + if not success:
> + return KunitResult(KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE,
> + 'could not build kernel',
>
> > - return KunitResult(KunitStatus.SUCCESS,
> > + status = KunitStatus.SUCCESS if success else KunitStatus.BUILD_FAILURE
> > + return KunitResult(status,
> > build_end - build_start)
>
> ditto here,
> return KunitResult(status, build_end - build_start)
>
> >
> > def config_and_build_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> > @@ -145,7 +138,7 @@ def exec_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree, request: KunitExecRequest) -
> > tests = _list_tests(linux, request)
> > if request.run_isolated == 'test':
> > filter_globs = tests
> > - if request.run_isolated == 'suite':
> > + elif request.run_isolated == 'suite':
>
> This is better, thanks.
>
> Daniel
