On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:49:58 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > While looking at the BTI selftest results on a non-BTI system I noticed > that not only are we printing invalid test numbers in that case, we're > skipping running the tests entirely even though there's a well defined > ABI we could be verifying and the code already knows what the results > should be. > > The first patch here is a fix to the reporting of test numbers when > skipping, the second one just removes the skipping entirely in favour of > a runtime check for what the result of a BTI binary should be. > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks! [1/2] kselftest/arm64: Fix test numbering when skipping tests https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/30792e7c18b6 [2/2] kselftest/arm64: Run BTI selftests on systems without BTI https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1c3b614548b5 -- Catalin